A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.
29 A. 38, 161 Pa. 348, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 694
Opinion
In view of the evidence properly before the jury in support of plaintiff’s claim, there was no error in directing the jury to find as they did. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Cf. Conshohocken Tube Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co., below, page 391.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co., 29 A. 38, 161 Pa. 348, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 694 (Pa. 1894).
29 A. 38 (A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Police Jury of the Parish of Plaquemines v. Foulhouze
30 La. Ann. 64 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)