A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.
29 A. 38, 161 Pa. 348, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 694
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 30, 1894
DocketAppeal, No. 101
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 29 A. 38 (A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
A. & P. Roberts & Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co., 29 A. 38, 161 Pa. 348, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 694 (Pa. 1894).
Opinion
In view of the evidence properly before the jury in support of plaintiff’s claim, there was no error in directing the jury to find as they did. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Cf. Conshohocken Tube Co. v. Iron Car Equipment Co., below, page 391.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Police Jury of the Parish of Plaquemines v. Foulhouze
30 La. Ann. 64 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 A. 38, 161 Pa. 348, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-p-roberts-co-v-iron-car-equipment-co-pa-1894.