A. P. Brantley Co. v. Smith

83 So. 301, 78 Fla. 463
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 19, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the rdespective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the-Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, -and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. P. Brantley Co. v. Smith, 83 So. 301, 78 Fla. 463 (Fla. 1919).

83 So. 301 (A. P. Brantley Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.