A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel

287 F.2d 572
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 30, 1960·No. 6559·Published

Opinion

287 F.2d 572

A. N. SPANEL et al.,
v.
ULA MINING CORPORATION.
ULA MINING CORPORATION
v.
A. N. SPANEL et al.

Nos. 6558, 6559.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1960.

Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, N.M., and Lyne, Blanchette, Smith & Shelton, Dallas, Tex., for appellants, and cross-appellees.

Dolley, Jessen & Painter, Los Angeles, Cal., and Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On joint motion and stipulation of the parties, cause remanded to United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for the entry of a consent settlement decree and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel, 287 F.2d 572 (10th Cir. 1960).

287 F.2d 572 (A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.