A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel
This text of 287 F.2d 572 (A. N. Spanel v. Ula Mining Corporation. Ula Mining Corporation v. A. N. Spanel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
287 F.2d 572
A. N. SPANEL et al.,
v.
ULA MINING CORPORATION.
ULA MINING CORPORATION
v.
A. N. SPANEL et al.
Nos. 6558, 6559.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1960.
Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, N.M., and Lyne, Blanchette, Smith & Shelton, Dallas, Tex., for appellants, and cross-appellees.
Dolley, Jessen & Painter, Los Angeles, Cal., and Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee and cross-appellant.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On joint motion and stipulation of the parties, cause remanded to United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for the entry of a consent settlement decree and judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 F.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-n-spanel-v-ula-mining-corporation-ula-mining-cor-ca10-1960.