A. & N. Railroad v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Kansas

A. & N. Railroad v. Hubbard

16 Kan. 156

DecidedJanuary 15, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Kan. 156 (A. & N. Railroad v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. & N. Railroad v. Hubbard, 16 Kan. 156 (kan 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the signing of a bill of exceptions. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the application should be refused,' but they do not agree in the reasons therefor. It is useless therefore to give the separate reasons of the judges, for there is no point of law settled or decided by the judgment in this case. Foltz v. Merrill, 11 Kas. 479.

Kingman,. C. J., concurring. Valentine, J., not sitting in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the signing of a bill of exceptions. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the application should be refused,' but they do not agree in the reasons therefor. It is useless therefore to give the separate reasons of the judges, for there is no point of law settled or decided by the judgment in this case. Foltz v. Merrill, 11 Kas. 479.

Kingman,. C. J., concurring. Valentine, J., not sitting in the case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Kan. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-n-railroad-v-hubbard-kan-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack