A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven
309 U.S. 638, 60 S. Ct. 810
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Central Land Co v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, 460-461; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 450.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven, 309 U.S. 638, 60 S. Ct. 810 (1940).
309 U.S. 638 (A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.
205 U.S. 454 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan
263 U.S. 444 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Central Land Co. v. Laidley
159 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1895)