A. M. Engel & Co. v. Davis

81 Misc. 202, 142 N.Y.S. 469
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 Misc. 202 (A. M. Engel & Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. M. Engel & Co. v. Davis, 81 Misc. 202, 142 N.Y.S. 469 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action claiming damages amounting to the sum of $280.17 by reason of fraud and deceit alleged to have been practiced upon it in procuring a written contract of employment, by virtue of which plaintiff advanced to the defendant that sum of money. The defendant interposed a counterclaim for $605 damages for breach of said contract. Issue was joined on April 16,1913, and the case adjourned until April thirty. On the adjourned day the plaintiff moved for another adjournment, which motion was denied. Thereupon the plaintiff moved to discontinue the action, and the court said: “Action discontinued. Complaint dismissed [203]*203without prejudice.” Thereafter, over objection by plaintiff, the defendant was permitted to introduce testimony in support of his counterclaim, and judgment was given in his favor thereon for $503.50 against the plaintiff. From this judgment plaintiff appeals. This court has held that in the Municipal Court the plaintiff has a right to discontinue his action at any time before it is finally submitted even though a counterclaim has been interposed (Nichols v. Williams, 42 Misc. Rep. 527; Harper Machinery Co. v. Dongan, 134 id. 888) and the discontinuance of the action terminates the right of the defendant upon his counterclaim in that action as well as the plaintiff’s cause of action.

Present: Seabuby, Page and Bijur, JJ. .

Judgment reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Photos v. Coufos
153 N.Y.S. 217 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Boutross v. Beilouney
152 N.Y.S. 988 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
A. M. Engel & Co. v. Davis
148 N.Y.S. 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Misc. 202, 142 N.Y.S. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-m-engel-co-v-davis-nysupct-1913.