A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik

92 N.Y.S. 247

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 247 (A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik, 92 N.Y.S. 247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reading the record, we are satisfied that the decision below was right. The point made by the appellant that the judgment was not rendered within the statutory time (Municipal Court Act, § 230, Laws 1902, p. 1557, c. 580) is without [248]*248merit, as the return shows that the cause was adjourned until November 25th for the submission of briefs, and that judgment was rendered on December 5,1904, within 11 days, and not 18 days, after submission, as claimed by the appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reading the record, we are satisfied that the decision below was right. The point made by the appellant that the judgment was not rendered within the statutory time (Municipal Court Act, § 230, Laws 1902, p. 1557, c. 580) is without [248]*248merit, as the return shows that the cause was adjourned until November 25th for the submission of briefs, and that judgment was rendered on December 5,1904, within 11 days, and not 18 days, after submission, as claimed by the appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-m-eisenberg-co-v-janzlik-nyappterm-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack