A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik
92 N.Y.S. 247
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 23, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
After reading the record, we are satisfied that the decision below was right. The point made by the appellant that the judgment was not rendered within the statutory time (Municipal Court Act, § 230, Laws 1902, p. 1557, c. 580) is without [248] merit, as the return shows that the cause was adjourned until November 25th for the submission of briefs, and that judgment was rendered on December 5,1904, within 11 days, and not 18 days, after submission, as claimed by the appellant.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik, 92 N.Y.S. 247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
92 N.Y.S. 247 (A. M. Eisenberg Co. v. Janzlik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carpenter v. Pirner
107 N.Y.S. 875 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Hill v. Hill
50 Misc. 654 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)