A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts.

Ohio Supreme Court

A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts.

2000 Ohio 162, 89 Ohio St. 3d 279

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

Docket2000-0420

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 162 (A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts., 2000 Ohio 162, 89 Ohio St. 3d 279 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 279.]

A & M BUILDERS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, APPELLANT. [Cite as A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts., 2000-Ohio-162.] Municipal corporations—Ordinances–Impact fees—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded for application of Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek. (No. 00-420—Submitted June 7, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 75676. __________________ Grendell & Simon Co., L.P.A., and Timothy J. Grendell, for appellees. Timothy G. Paluf, Director of Law, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. {¶ 2} The cause is remanded for application of Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 121, 729 N.E.2d 349. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 279.]

A & M BUILDERS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, APPELLANT. [Cite as A & M Builders, Inc. v. Highland Hts., 2000-Ohio-162.] Municipal corporations—Ordinances–Impact fees—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded for application of Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek. (No. 00-420—Submitted June 7, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 75676. __________________ Grendell & Simon Co., L.P.A., and Timothy J. Grendell, for appellees. Timothy G. Paluf, Director of Law, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. {¶ 2} The cause is remanded for application of Home Builders Assn. of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. Beavercreek (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 121, 729 N.E.2d 349. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 162, 89 Ohio St. 3d 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-m-builders-inc-v-highland-hts-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack