A. L. v. City of Bakersfield

Opinion

4 5 6 7 10 11 A.L., a minor, by and through his guardian Case No. 1:23-cv-00885-CDB ad litem, JANAE LEWIS, 12 SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) Plaintiff, 13 v. Discovery Deadlines: 14 Non-Expert: June 26, 2024 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., Expert: August 30, 2024 15 Mid-Discovery Conf.: May 8, 2024 16 Defendants. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 17 Filing: October 25, 2024 Hearing: November 29, 2024 18 Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 19 Filing: December 20, 2024 Hearing: January 24, 2025 20 Pre-Trial Conf.: March 7, 2025 (10:30am) 21 510 19th Street, Bakersfield

22 Trial: May 7, 2025 (8:30am) 510 19th Street, Bakersfield (5-7 days) 23 24 25 Plaintiff brings claims against City of Bakersfield, Officer Michael Mayorga, and Does 1 26 through 10 for unreasonable search and seizure, excessive force and failure to train, pursuant to 42 27 U.S.C. § 1983, for municipal liability under Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Srvcs. of City of New York, 436 28 U.S. 658 (1978), and related claims pursuant to state law. The Court convened a scheduling 1 conference off the record on October 6, 2023. Cameron Sehat appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Heather 2 Cohen appeared on behalf of Defendants. 3 I. Pleading Amendment 4 Any motions to amend the pleadings, including to substitute named parties for Doe 5 Defendants, must be filed by December 20, 2023. E.g., Dillman v. Tuolumne Cnty., No. 1:13-cv- 6 00404-LJO-SKO, 2014 WL 228582, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014). The parties should not construe a 7 timely filing of a motion or stipulation requesting leave to amend the pleadings to necessarily 8 constitute good cause to modify the existing schedule, if necessary. All proposed amendments must 9 (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any 10 modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 11 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) 12 prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) 13 futile. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 14 II. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date 15 The parties have exchanged their initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). 16 The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June 17 26, 2024, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before August 30, 2024. 18 The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before June 26, 2024, 19 and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before July 31, 2024. The written designation of retained and 20 non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and 21 shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this 22 order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such experts 23 that are not disclosed pursuant to this order. 24 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 25 experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 26 included in the designation. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 27 include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony. 28 1 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 2 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. 3 A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for May 8, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. before 4 Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference 5 report no later than one week before the conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via 6 e-mail to CDBorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint status report SHALL outline the discovery 7 counsel have completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to 8 completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel SHALL discuss 9 settlement and certify in the joint status report (1) that they have met/conferred regarding settlement, 10 and (2) proposed dates for convening a settlement conference with an unassigned magistrate judge. 11 III. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule / Informal Discovery Dispute Conferences 12 All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed by 13 October 25, 20241 and heard on or before November 29, 2024. For these hearings and at the 14 direction of the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, the Court may direct counsel to appear remotely (via 15 Zoom). For hearings noticed to occur in-person, the Court may permit counsel to appear remotely (via 16 Zoom) provided the Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the request to appear 17 remotely no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date. 18 No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it is 19 filed at least three days before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. 20 No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of Magistrate Judge 21 Baker. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith 22 effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the 23 requesting party promptly shall seek a conference with all involved parties and Magistrate Judge 24 Baker. To schedule this conference, the parties should contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan 25 Hall, at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. At least two days before the 26 27 1 Non-dispositive motions related to non-expert discovery SHALL be filed within a reasonable 28 time of discovery of the dispute, but in no event later than 30 days after the expiration of the non-expert discovery deadline. 1 conference, counsel SHALL file a joint, informal letter brief detailing each party’s position. Each 2 party’s narrative shall not exceed three pages, excluding exhibits. At the commencement of the 3 conference, if the parties jointly agree to Magistrate Judge Baker’s consideration and resolution of the 4 discovery disputes outside the formal Local Rule 251 procedures, the Court will entertain arguments 5 by the parties and issue a ruling. If the parties do not jointly agree to the informal discovery dispute 6 resolution procedures set forth herein, the requesting party may then seek relief through motion to 7 compel. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion 8 will be denied without prejudice and dropped from the Court’s calendar. 9 All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than December 20, 2024, and heard on 10 or before January 24, 2025. Motions are heard before Magistrate Judge Baker at 10:30 a.m., at the 11 United States District Courthouse, 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA. 12 IV. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication 13 At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 14 adjudication, the parties SHALL meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues to be 15 raised in the motion. 16 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 17 question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole 18 or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the 19 issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the 20 expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts. 21 The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 22 statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement 23 of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 24 deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 25 statement of undisputed facts. 26 In the notice of motion, the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and 27 conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. 28 Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken. 1 V. Pre-Trial Conference 2 March 7, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., located at the United States District Courthouse, 510 19th Street, 3 Bakersfield, CA, before Magistrate Judge Baker. 4 The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2). The 5 parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format, directly 6 to Magistrate Judge Baker’s chambers, by email at CDBorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 7 Counsels’ attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules for the Eastern District 8 of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. The Court will 9 insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the Local Rules, 10 the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the Court to 11 explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire. 12 VI. Trial Date 13 May 7, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., located at the United States District Courthouse, 510 19th Street, 14 Bakersfield, CA, before Magistrate Judge Baker. 15 A. This is a jury trial 16 B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-7 days 17 C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 18 California, Rule 285. 19 VII. Settlement Conference 20 The parties SHALL meet and confer and notify the Court prior to the Pre-Trial Conference 21 whether they wish to convene a Settlement Conference. In the event the parties request a Settlement 22 Conference, unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case 23 shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full 24 authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement 25

26 2 Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like 27 shall be represented by a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent 28 possible, the representative shall have authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand. 1 is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the 2 procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference. 3 At least twenty-one days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to 4 Defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand 5 which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 6 fourteen days before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an 7 acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer which includes a brief explanation of why 8 such a settlement is appropriate. 9 If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their 10 Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall 11 not be filed on the court docket. 13 At least five court days prior to the settlement conference, the parties shall submit a 14 Confidential Settlement Conference Statement via email directly to the chambers of the unassigned 15 magistrate judge referred to the settlement conference. The statement should not be filed with the 16 Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of 17 Settlement Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date 18 and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 19 The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following: 20 A. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 21 B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon 22 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the 23 claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute. 24 C. A summary of the proceedings to date. 25

3 “Meaningful” means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the 27 offering party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If, however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party 28 will not accept, this should trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the settlement conference via stipulation. 1 D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and tria 2 E. The relief sought. 3 F. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history 4 || of past settlement discussions, offers and demands. 5 || VIII. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorte1 6 Trial 7 The parties request bifurcation on the issue of punitive damages. 8 ||IX. Related Matters Pending 9 There are no pending related matters. 10 || X. Compliance with Federal Procedure 11 All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 || and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments 13 thereto. The Court requires compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its increasing case load 14 ||XI._—— Effect of this Order 15 The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda mo: 16 || suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the 17 || parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are 18 || ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by 19 || stipulation or by subsequent status conference. 20 The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 21 || showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 22 || extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 23 || affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 24 || for granting the relief requested. 25 || IT IS SO ORDERED. *° | Dated: _ October 6, 2023 | bh 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28