A & L Plumbing & Heating Co. v. James Redfield Plumbing & Heating Co.
This text of 54 A.D.2d 952 (A & L Plumbing & Heating Co. v. James Redfield Plumbing & Heating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for an accounting and to recover damages for breach of contract, defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 16, 1976, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of the Statute of Frauds and failure to state a cause of action, with leave granted to assert the defense of Statute of Frauds as an affirmative defense in their answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We agree with Special Term that the conflicting versions of the facts presented by the parties indicate that the possible applicability of the Statute of Frauds should be decided at the trial. We also agree that plaintiffs’ allegations of consideration are sufficient to save the complaint from dismissal for failure to state a cause of action. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 952, 388 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-l-plumbing-heating-co-v-james-redfield-plumbing-heating-co-nyappdiv-1976.