A. L. Liebman & Sons, Inc. v. United States
This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 903 (A. L. Liebman & Sons, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A,” invoiced as drawer locks Nos. 305 and' 306, covered by the foregoing protest consist of cabinet locks, not of [904]*904.pin tumbler or cylinder construction, not over 1½ inches in width, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669) ; and that the items of merchandise marked “B,” invoiced as brass pushlocks No. 106, are neither cabinet locks nor padlocks but consist of other locks not of pin tumbler or cylinder construction, composed in chief value of brass, the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cust. Ct. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-l-liebman-sons-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.