A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cabinet locks, not of cylinder or pin tumbler construction, similar in construction to the cabinet locks which were the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 868 (A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 422 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)