A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779
This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 868 (A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779 (cusc 1967).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cabinet locks, not of cylinder or pin tumbler construction, similar in construction to the cabinet locks which were the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 422 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
59 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-l-liebman-son-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.