A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 509
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 Cust. Ct. 74
United States Customs Court·Decided May 31, 1961·No. No. 65719; protests 253688-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon filaments similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 509 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 509 (A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)