A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC

S.D. New York

A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC

DecidedAugust 16, 2021

Docket1:21-cv-06066

StatusUnknown

This text of A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC (A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

McCARRON & DIEss Stephen P. McCarrona 4530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 301 Focusing on Cases under Louis W. Diess, HIa0 WASHINGTON, DC 20016 the Perishable Agricultural Mary Jean Fassettd (202) 364-0400 FAX (202) 364-2731 Commodities Act (PACA) Kate Elisa Blake A. Surbeya 576 BROADHOLLOW ROAD, SUITE 105 0 Not admitted in DC Gregory A. Brownxt MELVILLE, NY 11747 4 Not admitted in NY (631) 425-8110 FAX (202) 364-2731 Reply to Melville, NY www.mecarronlaw.com gbrown @mccarronlaw.com www.pacawebguide.com August 16, 2021 VIA ECF ONLY Hon. Sarah L. Cave United States District Court 500 Pearl Street, Room 1670 New York, New York 10007 Re: A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce, LLC d/b/a Sycamore Foods NJ; Case No. 21-cv-6066 (PAC) Dear Judge Cave: We are the attorneys for A & J Produce Corp., Mendez International Tropical Foods Inc. and Top Banana LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in the above-referenced action which is currently pending before Judge Crotty. On July 15, 2021, Judge Crotty entered a temporary restraining order (Docket No. 25) (the “TRO”’) which, among other things, enjoined and restrained some of the defendants from dissipating any portion of the statutory trust res established pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499a, et seg. (“PACA”), and scheduled a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. On the consent of the parties, Judge Crotty adjourned the preliminary injunction hearing, and extend the TRO, until his return from vacation in September (Docket No. 40). Judge Crotty instructed that if the parties need relief prior to his return, we should seek relief from your Honor. After much drafting and negotiation, the parties have agreed to resolve Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as more fully set forth in the enclosed Consent Injunction Order and Order Establishing PACA Trust Claims Procedure and Granting Related Relief (the “PACA Claims Procedure Order’), a copy of which is being contemporaneously submitted to the Orders and Judgments Clerk. In the last paragraph, the parties expressly consent to your Honor’ jurisdiction and request that you review, approve and enter the PACA Claims Procedure Order on a final basis. The procedures reflected in the PACA Claims Procedure Order is necessary to facilitate the recovery of the PACA Trust Assets, prevent the loss or diversion of such assets, minimize administrative costs, determine the amount of valid claims to the assets, and distribute the PACA Trust Assets pro rata to qualified PACA Trust Beneficiaries. Doing so in the manner set forth in

Hon. Sarah L. Cave United States District Court Page 2 the proposed order will minimize the burden on the judiciary, and the cost to defendants, of resolving the various claims against what is now a defunct business. The PACA trust is one continuous trust for the benefit of all unpaid produce suppliers which arises upon the produce buyer’s first produce purchase on credit and remains in existence until all the debtor’s produce suppliers are paid in full. In re Kornblum & Co., Inc., 81 F.3d 280, 286 (2d Cir. 1996). Each produce supplier is entitled to a pro rata distribution of trust assets. In re: Milton Poulos, Inc., 107 B.R. 715 (9" Cir. B.A.P. 1989); In re: United Fruit & Produce, 86 B.R. 14 (Bankr. D.Conn. 1988). The claims of PACA trust creditors to PACA trust assets are superior to the claims of all other creditors, including secured creditors. A & J Produce Corp. v. Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp., 542 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 2008); see also, Chiquita Fresh N. Am., LLC vy. Long Island Banana Corp., 198 F. Supp. 3d 171 (E.D.N.Y., 2016). As a result, claims against PACA debtors are regularly resolved using procedures very similar to the ones proposed in the PACA Claims Procedure Order. See, e.g., id. at Docket No. 23; Produce Alliance, LLC v. West Central Produce, Inc., United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 2:20-cv-2921-PSG (AGRx), Docket No. 13; Greengate Fresh, LLLP y. Trinity Fresh Procurement, LLC, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:18-cv- 0316-JAM-EFB, Docket No. 47. Based on the cited jurisprudence, the parties jointly respectfully request that your Honor enter the PACA Claims Procedure Order in the form submitted herewith. We are happy to answer any questions your Honor may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, McCarron & Diess

Gregory Brown Enclosure The parties’ request for Court approval of their Consent Injunction Order and Order Establishing PACA Trust Claims Procedure and Granting Related Relief (the “PACA Claims Procedure Order”) (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter to PACA Claims Procedure Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 11, 13, and 43. SO ORDERED 8/16/2021 aN /) A | iL (e_ [ SARAH L. CAYE Iimisad CaaSane Raa geioctenta [wae

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCARRON & DIEss Stephen P. McCarrona 4530 WISCONSIN AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 301 Focusing on Cases under Louis W. Diess, HIa0 WASHINGTON, DC 20016 the Perishable Agricultural Mary Jean Fassettd (202) 364-0400 FAX (202) 364-2731 Commodities Act (PACA) Kate Elisa Blake A. Surbeya 576 BROADHOLLOW ROAD, SUITE 105 0 Not admitted in DC Gregory A. Brownxt MELVILLE, NY 11747 4 Not admitted in NY (631) 425-8110 FAX (202) 364-2731 Reply to Melville, NY www.mecarronlaw.com gbrown @mccarronlaw.com www.pacawebguide.com August 16, 2021 VIA ECF ONLY Hon. Sarah L. Cave United States District Court 500 Pearl Street, Room 1670 New York, New York 10007 Re: A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce, LLC d/b/a Sycamore Foods NJ; Case No. 21-cv-6066 (PAC) Dear Judge Cave: We are the attorneys for A & J Produce Corp., Mendez International Tropical Foods Inc. and Top Banana LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in the above-referenced action which is currently pending before Judge Crotty. On July 15, 2021, Judge Crotty entered a temporary restraining order (Docket No. 25) (the “TRO”’) which, among other things, enjoined and restrained some of the defendants from dissipating any portion of the statutory trust res established pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499a, et seg. (“PACA”), and scheduled a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. On the consent of the parties, Judge Crotty adjourned the preliminary injunction hearing, and extend the TRO, until his return from vacation in September (Docket No. 40). Judge Crotty instructed that if the parties need relief prior to his return, we should seek relief from your Honor. After much drafting and negotiation, the parties have agreed to resolve Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as more fully set forth in the enclosed Consent Injunction Order and Order Establishing PACA Trust Claims Procedure and Granting Related Relief (the “PACA Claims Procedure Order’), a copy of which is being contemporaneously submitted to the Orders and Judgments Clerk. In the last paragraph, the parties expressly consent to your Honor’ jurisdiction and request that you review, approve and enter the PACA Claims Procedure Order on a final basis. The procedures reflected in the PACA Claims Procedure Order is necessary to facilitate the recovery of the PACA Trust Assets, prevent the loss or diversion of such assets, minimize administrative costs, determine the amount of valid claims to the assets, and distribute the PACA Trust Assets pro rata to qualified PACA Trust Beneficiaries. Doing so in the manner set forth in

Hon. Sarah L. Cave United States District Court Page 2 the proposed order will minimize the burden on the judiciary, and the cost to defendants, of resolving the various claims against what is now a defunct business. The PACA trust is one continuous trust for the benefit of all unpaid produce suppliers which arises upon the produce buyer’s first produce purchase on credit and remains in existence until all the debtor’s produce suppliers are paid in full. In re Kornblum & Co., Inc., 81 F.3d 280, 286 (2d Cir. 1996). Each produce supplier is entitled to a pro rata distribution of trust assets. In re: Milton Poulos, Inc., 107 B.R. 715 (9" Cir. B.A.P. 1989); In re: United Fruit & Produce, 86 B.R. 14 (Bankr. D.Conn. 1988). The claims of PACA trust creditors to PACA trust assets are superior to the claims of all other creditors, including secured creditors. A & J Produce Corp. v. Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp., 542 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 2008); see also, Chiquita Fresh N. Am., LLC vy. Long Island Banana Corp., 198 F. Supp. 3d 171 (E.D.N.Y., 2016). As a result, claims against PACA debtors are regularly resolved using procedures very similar to the ones proposed in the PACA Claims Procedure Order. See, e.g., id. at Docket No. 23; Produce Alliance, LLC v. West Central Produce, Inc., United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 2:20-cv-2921-PSG (AGRx), Docket No. 13; Greengate Fresh, LLLP y. Trinity Fresh Procurement, LLC, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:18-cv- 0316-JAM-EFB, Docket No. 47. Based on the cited jurisprudence, the parties jointly respectfully request that your Honor enter the PACA Claims Procedure Order in the form submitted herewith. We are happy to answer any questions your Honor may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, McCarron & Diess

Gregory Brown Enclosure The parties’ request for Court approval of their Consent Injunction Order and Order Establishing PACA Trust Claims Procedure and Granting Related Relief (the “PACA Claims Procedure Order”) (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter to PACA Claims Procedure Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 11, 13, and 43. SO ORDERED 8/16/2021 aN /) A | iL (e_ [ SARAH L. CAYE Iimisad CaaSane Raa geioctenta [wae

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

A & J Produce Corp. v. Dr Produce LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-j-produce-corp-v-dr-produce-llc-nysd-2021.