A. H. Arnold & Co. v. Kennedy

84 F.2d 989, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 1936
DocketNo. 6965
StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 989 (A. H. Arnold & Co. v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. H. Arnold & Co. v. Kennedy, 84 F.2d 989, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4677 (6th Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that the contract under which the appellant seeks reclamation is a chattel mortgage and not a conditional sales contract with retention of title in the seller, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court denying reclamation be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F.2d 989, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-h-arnold-co-v-kennedy-ca6-1936.