A. G. Triplett, R. M. Triplett, A. Nelson v. Percival D. Lowell, Francis W. Dunmore, and Dubilier Condenser Corporation.

296 U.S. 621
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1935
Docket388
StatusPublished

This text of 296 U.S. 621 (A. G. Triplett, R. M. Triplett, A. Nelson v. Percival D. Lowell, Francis W. Dunmore, and Dubilier Condenser Corporation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. G. Triplett, R. M. Triplett, A. Nelson v. Percival D. Lowell, Francis W. Dunmore, and Dubilier Condenser Corporation., 296 U.S. 621 (1935).

Opinion

296 U.S. 621

56 S.Ct. 142

80 L.Ed. 441

A. G. TRIPLETT, R. M. Triplett, A. Nelson, et al., petitioners,
v.
Percival D. LOWELL, Francis W. Dunmore, and Dubilier Condenser Corporation.*

No. 388.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1935

Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for petitioners.

Mr. C. V. Edwards, of New York City, for respondents.

For opinion below, see 77 F.(2d) 556.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*

Rehearing granted 296 U. S. 570, 56 S. Ct. 306, 80 L. Ed. 402.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowell v. Triplett
77 F.2d 556 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-g-triplett-r-m-triplett-a-nelson-v-percival-d-lowell-francis-w-scotus-1935.