A. G. Curtain Mfg. Co. v. Law Union & Rock Insurance of London

138 Misc. 556, 246 N.Y.S. 488, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1689
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 16, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has been decided that different plaintiffs may join in one action brought in the City Court against the same defendant although the aggregate amount of the judgments demanded exceeds the constitutional and statutory limitation of $3,000. (Spetler v. Jogel Realty Co., 224 App. Div. 612.) It Would seem to follow that consolidation of actions brought in said court by a single plaintiff against a different defendant in each instance where the amount claimed in none of the actions exceeds $3,000, may not be held offensive to the jurisdictional limitation, since that limitation is imposed for the benefit of defendants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. G. Curtain Mfg. Co. v. Law Union & Rock Insurance of London, 138 Misc. 556, 246 N.Y.S. 488, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

138 Misc. 556 (A. G. Curtain Mfg. Co. v. Law Union & Rock Insurance of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalmanowitz v. Solomon
22 Misc. 2d 988 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1960)
Robles v. Rushfield
7 Misc. 2d 734 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Farkas v. Metz
160 Misc. 9 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)