A. G. Breitweiser Co. v. Scott

33 Pa. Super. 627, 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 353
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 13, 1907
DocketAppeal, No. 159
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 Pa. Super. 627 (A. G. Breitweiser Co. v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. G. Breitweiser Co. v. Scott, 33 Pa. Super. 627, 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 353 (Pa. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order discharging a rule to show cause why a mechanic’s lien should not be struck off. Prior to the Act of June 4, 1901 P. L. 431 it was held that an independent appeal did not lie from such an order, for the reason that it is not a definitive decree or judgment: Carter v. Caldwell, 147 Pa. 370; Philadelphia v. Christman, 6 Pa. Superior Ct. 29; Keemer v. Herr, 2 Penny. 175; 12 W. N. C. 90. The rule has not been changed by the act of 1901. Appeals should not be resorted to when the effect is to bring cases into appellate courts by installments ; such a practice is attended with obvious disadvantages and necessarily delays their final disposition.

The appeal is quashed and the record remitted to the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lubetsky v. DEAN
142 A.2d 359 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Miller v. Fitz
41 Pa. Super. 582 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Pa. Super. 627, 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-g-breitweiser-co-v-scott-pasuperct-1907.