A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber

Ninth Circuit

A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber

311 F. App'x 966

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2009·No. Nos. 07-55004, 07-55856·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On January 7, 2009, Appellant moved this court for clarification regarding the district court’s denial of a joint stipulation on attorney-client privileged documents. Appellant’s unopposed motion for clarification is granted. The district court abused its discretion in summarily denying the proposed order for lack of good cause. The district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the portion of the proposed order that would require the clerk to redact privileged material from filed pleadings. The district court’s denial of the parties’ joint stipulation is REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On January 7, 2009, Appellant moved this court for clarification regarding the district court’s denial of a joint stipulation on attorney-client privileged documents. Appellant’s unopposed motion for clarification is granted. The district court abused its discretion in summarily denying the proposed order for lack of good cause. The district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the portion of the proposed order that would require the clerk to redact privileged material from filed pleadings. The district court’s denial of the parties’ joint stipulation is REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber, 311 F. App'x 966 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

311 F. App'x 966 (A. Farber & Partners, Inc. v. Garber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.