A & F Gulf Service, Inc. v. Jackson

260 A.D.2d 474, 686 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3854
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 474 (A & F Gulf Service, Inc. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A & F Gulf Service, Inc. v. Jackson, 260 A.D.2d 474, 686 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated April 30, 1998, which, after a hearing, affirmed determinations revoking both the corporate petitioner’s inspection station license and the individual petitioner’s inspection card, upon a finding that the petitioners had violated certain provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and the regulations of the respondent.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The instant proceeding was transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), as the petitioners initially raised a substantial evidence question in their petition. In the brief to this Court, however, the petitioners no longer contend that the respondent’s determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Their only contention is that the penalty imposed upon them was excessive. Although no substantial evidence question was brought up for review, this Court will retain jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding this case on the merits (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233; Matter of Charles v Commissioner, N. Y. State Dept, of Social Servs., 240 AD2d 490).

Under all of the circumstances, including the petitioners’ prior disciplinary record, the penalty of revocation of the corporate petitioner’s inspection station license and the individual petitioner’s inspection card was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra; Matter of VOC Bus Corp. v Jackson, 251 AD2d 337). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Koehl v. Duncan
167 N.Y.S.3d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Maroccia v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.
2017 NY Slip Op 7811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Somma v. Jackson
268 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D.2d 474, 686 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-f-gulf-service-inc-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1999.