A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr.

DecidedJune 9, 2005

Docket13-05-00032-CV

StatusPublished

This text of A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr. (A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-032-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

A. E. JOHNSON, Appellant,

v.

JOE JOHNSON, JR., ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Harris County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, A. E. JOHNSON, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, in cause no. 816804. The clerk’s record was received on December 21, 2004.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Additionally, it was noted that if the order was in fact an appealable order, it appeared that the appeal had not been timely perfected. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of these defects were given so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On March 11, 2005, appellant filed a response to this Court’s notice; however, the response fails to correct the defects or show this Court’s jurisdiction.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 9th day of June, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-032-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

A. E. JOHNSON, Appellant,

v.

JOE JOHNSON, JR., ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Harris County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, A. E. JOHNSON, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, in cause no. 816804. The clerk’s record was received on December 21, 2004.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Additionally, it was noted that if the order was in fact an appealable order, it appeared that the appeal had not been timely perfected. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of these defects were given so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On March 11, 2005, appellant filed a response to this Court’s notice; however, the response fails to correct the defects or show this Court’s jurisdiction.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 9th day of June, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

A. E. Johnson v. Joe Johnson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-e-johnson-v-joe-johnson-jr-texapp-2005.