A. E. Garland & Co. v. Allen

Indiana Court of Appeals

A. E. Garland & Co. v. Allen

116 N.E. 8, 67 Ind. App. 396, 1917 Ind. App. LEXIS 247

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 11, 1917

DocketNo. 9,533

StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.E. 8 (A. E. Garland & Co. v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. E. Garland & Co. v. Allen, 116 N.E. 8, 67 Ind. App. 396, 1917 Ind. App. LEXIS 247 (Ind. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Dausman, J.

Appellee instituted this action against appellants to replevin an automobile, and to recover damages for the unlawful detention thereof. Trial by the court resulted in judgment for the delivery of the automobile to appellee, and for $100 damages ; also judgment for appellant for $92.52 against appellee on appellants’ claim for storage charges.

Appellee has filed a verified motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants, in obedience to the order of the court, have delivered the automobile to appellee, and that the parties have amicably adjusted all matters involved herein. Appellants have had due notice of the filing of said motion, but have made no counter showing. Their silence, therefore, must be taken as an admission of the correctness of the statements embodied in the motion.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 116 N. E. 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dausman, J.

Appellee instituted this action against appellants to replevin an automobile, and to recover damages for the unlawful detention thereof. Trial by the court resulted in judgment for the delivery of the automobile to appellee, and for $100 damages ; also judgment for appellant for $92.52 against appellee on appellants’ claim for storage charges.

Appellee has filed a verified motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants, in obedience to the order of the court, have delivered the automobile to appellee, and that the parties have amicably adjusted all matters involved herein. Appellants have had due notice of the filing of said motion, but have made no counter showing. Their silence, therefore, must be taken as an admission of the correctness of the statements embodied in the motion.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 116 N. E. 8.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 N.E. 8, 67 Ind. App. 396, 1917 Ind. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-e-garland-co-v-allen-indctapp-1917.