A & E Communications, LLC v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

A & E Communications, LLC v. Division of Employment Security

505 S.W.3d 433, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1275, 2016 WL 7209817

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 13, 2016

DocketWD 79633

StatusPublished

This text of 505 S.W.3d 433 (A & E Communications, LLC v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A & E Communications, LLC v. Division of Employment Security, 505 S.W.3d 433, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1275, 2016 WL 7209817 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A & E Communications (“A & E”) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s determination that it is an employer subject to Missouri Employment Security Law. On appeal, A & E claims that the weight of the factors of the test determining whether a relationship between a business and its workers is an employer/employee relationship or an independent contractor relationship showed that its workers were independent contractors rather than employees. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A & E Communications (“A & E”) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s determination that it is an employer subject to Missouri Employment Security Law. On appeal, A & E claims that the weight of the factors of the test determining whether a relationship between a business and its workers is an employer/employee relationship or an independent contractor relationship showed that its workers were independent contractors rather than employees. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 S.W.3d 433, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1275, 2016 WL 7209817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-e-communications-llc-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2016.