A. C. & H. M. Hall Realty Co. v. v. A. C. Corp.
93 N.E.2d 78, 301 N.Y. 526, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 878
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. This court does not read the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.) as imposing an obligation for rent upon a tenant who has surrendered the premises although a subtenant remains in possession of a portion thereof. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. C. & H. M. Hall Realty Co. v. v. A. C. Corp., 93 N.E.2d 78, 301 N.Y. 526, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 878 (N.Y. 1950).
93 N.E.2d 78 (A. C. & H. M. Hall Realty Co. v. v. A. C. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. Interborough News Co.
277 A.D.2d 97 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)