A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 443, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641
United States Customs Court·Decided October 5, 1965·No. No. 69576; protests 64/22401, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[444]*444Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable, according to the component material of chief value or under specific provisions, as follows: The items marked “A” at 19 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactured articles, in chief value of base metal, and the items marked “B,” which are in chief value of plastic, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended, at 22% percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for manufactured articles in chief value of base metal, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 443, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641 (cusc 1965).

55 Cust. Ct. 443 (A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.