A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United Electrical Mfg. Co.
58 F.2d 990, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4823
Opinion
The decrees in the above entitled canses [58 F.(2d) 988] are affirmed on authority of Grinnell Washing Machine Co. v. Johnson Co., 247 U. S. 426, 434, 38 S. Ct. 547, 62 L. Ed. 1196; Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery, 269 U. S. 177, 184, 185, 46 S. Ct. 42, 70 L. Ed. 222; and Saranac Mach. Co. v. Wirebounds Co., 282 U. S. 704, 713, 51 S. Ct. 232, 75 L. Ed. 634.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United Electrical Mfg. Co., 58 F.2d 990, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4823 (6th Cir. 1932).
58 F.2d 990 (A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United Electrical Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.
247 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery
269 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Saranac Automatic MacHine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.
282 U.S. 704 (Supreme Court, 1931)
A. C. Gilbert Co. v. United Electrical Mfg. Co.
58 F.2d 988 (E.D. Michigan, 1930)