A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States

327 F.2d 659, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 592, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1964
Docket9194_1
StatusPublished

This text of 327 F.2d 659 (A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States, 327 F.2d 659, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 592, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633 (4th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court sitting without a jury. The question at issue is what part, if any, of the consideration received by the taxpayer for the sale of his interest in a partnership is allocable to good will and, therefore, to be treated as capital gain, and what part is allocable to his covenant not to compete and, therefore, to be treated as ordinary income.

We find substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the district court that 75% of the consideration is allocable to the sale of good will and 25% to the covenant not to compete. Since these findings are not clearly erroneous, we affirm. Cf. Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 80 S.Ct. 1190, 4 L.Ed.2d 1218.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioner v. Duberstein
363 U.S. 278 (Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F.2d 659, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 592, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-bruce-umstead-and-margaret-w-umstead-v-united-states-ca4-1964.