A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States

327 F.2d 659, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 592, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 1964·No. 9194_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court sitting without a jury. The question at issue is what part, if any, of the consideration received by the taxpayer for the sale of his interest in a partnership is allocable to good will and, therefore, to be treated as capital gain, and what part is allocable to his covenant not to compete and, therefore, to be treated as ordinary income.

We find substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the district court that 75% of the consideration is allocable to the sale of good will and 25% to the covenant not to compete. Since these findings are not clearly erroneous, we affirm. Cf. Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 80 S.Ct. 1190, 4 L.Ed.2d 1218.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States, 327 F.2d 659, 13 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 592, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633 (4th Cir. 1964).

327 F.2d 659 (A. Bruce Umstead and Margaret W. Umstead v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner v. Duberstein
363 U.S. 278 (Supreme Court, 1960)