A. Baldwin & Co. v. B & R Fences, Inc.
This text of 365 So. 2d 943 (A. Baldwin & Co. v. B & R Fences, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an open account case where the affidavit of correctness of the account is executed by an officer of the plaintiff corporation and refers to invoices attached to the petition showing receipt of merchandise by defendant from a corporation other than the plaintiff corporation, no prima facie proof has been established to support a default judgment in favor of plaintiff.1 CCP 681; CCP 690; CCP 1702; Eddie’s Hardware, Inc. v. Rago, 320 So.2d 276 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1975); Carboline Co. v. Hymel 335 So.2d 45 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1976).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and set aside. The matter is remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 So. 2d 943, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 2786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-baldwin-co-v-b-r-fences-inc-lactapp-1978.