A. B. & W. Transit Co., a Body Corporate v. Laureen Kunz, Nestor D. Sanchez, Individually and to the Use of National Surety Co.

D.C. Circuit

A. B. & W. Transit Co., a Body Corporate v. Laureen Kunz, Nestor D. Sanchez, Individually and to the Use of National Surety Co.

250 F.2d 395, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 70, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4153

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1957

Docket14082_1

StatusPublished

This text of 250 F.2d 395 (A. B. & W. Transit Co., a Body Corporate v. Laureen Kunz, Nestor D. Sanchez, Individually and to the Use of National Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. B. & W. Transit Co., a Body Corporate v. Laureen Kunz, Nestor D. Sanchez, Individually and to the Use of National Surety Co., 250 F.2d 395, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 70, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4153 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

*396 PER CURIAM.

As a result of a collision between a bus of the A. B. & W. Transit Company, appellant, and an automobile driven by appellee Sanchez, in which appellee Kunz was a passenger, each of appellees was awarded damages by a jury and judgments were entered accordingly. The appeal of the Transit Company raises questions as to admission of evidence and instructions to the jury. In the context of evidence and instructions as a whole we find no error which would justify reversal of either judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*396 PER CURIAM.

As a result of a collision between a bus of the A. B. & W. Transit Company, appellant, and an automobile driven by appellee Sanchez, in which appellee Kunz was a passenger, each of appellees was awarded damages by a jury and judgments were entered accordingly. The appeal of the Transit Company raises questions as to admission of evidence and instructions to the jury. In the context of evidence and instructions as a whole we find no error which would justify reversal of either judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 F.2d 395, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 70, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-b-w-transit-co-a-body-corporate-v-laureen-kunz-nestor-d-cadc-1957.