A. B. Dick Co. v. Wickelman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

A. B. Dick Co. v. Wickelman

77 F. 853, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3019

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 31, 1896·Published

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This cause has now been beard upon a motion by the defendant to set aside the interlocutory decree. The principal ground of the motion is the alleged wrongful use of Potts & Co. v. Greager, 155 U. S. 597, 15 Sup. Ct. 194, and 70 O. G. 494. Rut that case was noticed and considered by the court before, and, if any error arose in the use made of it, such error was an error of the court, and not a misuse of counsel. Nothing is made to appear now that was not shown before; no error is pointed out or perceived that should set aside the decree as the case is now here viewed; and if such error is still supposed to exist it can be corrected on appeal, if found. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

This cause has now been beard upon a motion by the defendant to set aside the interlocutory decree. The principal ground of the motion is the alleged wrongful use of Potts & Co. v. Greager, 155 U. S. 597, 15 Sup. Ct. 194, and 70 O. G. 494. Rut that case was noticed and considered by the court before, and, if any error arose in the use made of it, such error was an error of the court, and not a misuse of counsel. Nothing is made to appear now that was not shown before; no error is pointed out or perceived that should set aside the decree as the case is now here viewed; and if such error is still supposed to exist it can be corrected on appeal, if found. Motion denied.

A. B. Dick Co. v. Wickelman, 77 F. 853, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3019 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

77 F. 853 (A. B. Dick Co. v. Wickelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related