A. Arnold v. M. J. Segal
This text of 269 S.W. 1116 (A. Arnold v. M. J. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case appellant sued appellees, a copartnership composed of M. J. Segal, Nate Rosenbaum, and Sam Segal, for damages on account of certain libelous matter alleged to have been printed and published by .appellees of and concerning him. Appellees answered in the suit. The. case was tried, and a verdict returned and judgment entered in 1923, in appellees’ favor. Appellant duly filed a motion for a new .trial, which was overruled, and appellant excepted, and gave notice of and perfected his appeal. Briefs have not been filed in this court by any of the parties. The appeal is dismissed, because of the appellant’s failuré to brief the ease. Rule 38, 230 S. W. viii; Smith v. Spearman (Tex. Civ. App.) 249 S. W. 252. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 S.W. 1116, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-arnold-v-m-j-segal-texapp-1925.