A. Anderson Decorating Co. v. Gross

Appellate Court of Illinois

A. Anderson Decorating Co. v. Gross

210 Ill. App. 97

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 13, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,254

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Ill. App. 97 (A. Anderson Decorating Co. v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. Anderson Decorating Co. v. Gross, 210 Ill. App. 97 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the iourt.

2. Evidence, § 73*—what is not proper rebuttal testimony. Certain photographs offered by defendant as demonstrating and illustrating certain claimed defects in plaintiff’s work were properly excluded in rebuttal to plaintiff’s rebuttal which had brought no new matter into the case but had merely denied the existence of each and every defect testified to by defendant and defendant’s witnesses, in an action to recover for services rendered and materials furnished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the iourt.

2. Evidence, § 73*—what is not proper rebuttal testimony. Certain photographs offered by defendant as demonstrating and illustrating certain claimed defects in plaintiff’s work were properly excluded in rebuttal to plaintiff’s rebuttal which had brought no new matter into the case but had merely denied the existence of each and every defect testified to by defendant and defendant’s witnesses, in an action to recover for services rendered and materials furnished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Ill. App. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-anderson-decorating-co-v-gross-illappct-1918.