A. ALEXIS VARELA, INC. D/B/A THE VARELA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, A FLORIDA CORPORATION vs DOMINIC PAGIO AND JULIA PAGIO
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
A. ALEXIS VARELA, INC., D/B/A THE VARELA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, A FLORIDA CORPORATION,
Appellant, Case No. 5D21-2077 v. LT Case No. CC21-1654
DOMINIC PAGIO AND JULIA PAGIO,
Appellees. ________________________________/
Opinion filed July 15, 2022
Appeal from the County Court for St. Johns County, Charles J. Tinlin, Judge.
Thomas J. Tollefsen, of Tritt & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Mary Scheps Scott, of Mary Scott Law, Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant Appellees’ Amended Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our
prior opinion, and substitute the following. AFFIRMED. See Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731
So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla. 1999) (acknowledging that, pursuant to the tipsy
coachman doctrine, “if a trial court reaches the right result, but for the wrong
reasons, it will be upheld if there is any basis which would support the
judgment in the record”).
SASSO, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. ALEXIS VARELA, INC. D/B/A THE VARELA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, A FLORIDA CORPORATION vs DOMINIC PAGIO AND JULIA PAGIO (A. ALEXIS VARELA, INC. D/B/A THE VARELA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, A FLORIDA CORPORATION vs DOMINIC PAGIO AND JULIA PAGIO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.