A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Hodge

Missouri Court of Appeals

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Hodge

416 S.W.3d 832, 2013 WL 6835238, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1519

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 24, 2013·No. No. ED 99986·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A-l Premium Acceptance, Inc. (“A-l”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Joe Hodge (“Hodge”). A-l argues the trial court’s judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence and misapplied agency and contract law.

[833] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A-l Premium Acceptance, Inc. (“A-l”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Joe Hodge (“Hodge”). A-l argues the trial court’s judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence and misapplied agency and contract law.

[833] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Hodge, 416 S.W.3d 832, 2013 WL 6835238, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

416 S.W.3d 832 (A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Hodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.