A-1 Merchandising Corp. v. Tankersley
This text of 191 So. 2d 554 (A-1 Merchandising Corp. v. Tankersley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 22, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 So. 2d 554, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-1-merchandising-corp-v-tankersley-fla-1966.