9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 2009
Docket13-04-00618-CV
StatusPublished

This text of 9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc. (9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-00618-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________



9999 HOLDINGS, INC. AND GEORGE KOUMBIS, Appellants,



v.



MAX HEATHERINGTON AND AMERICAN

TACTICAL AMMUNITION, INC., Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



This appeal was abated by this Court on March 24, 2005, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On May 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 25th day of June, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/9999-holdings-inc-and-george-koumbis-v-max-heather-texapp-2009.