9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc.
This text of 9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc. (9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
9999 HOLDINGS, INC. AND GEORGE KOUMBIS, Appellants,
MAX HEATHERINGTON AND AMERICAN
TACTICAL AMMUNITION, INC., Appellees.
_____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This appeal was abated by this Court on March 24, 2005, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On May 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.
The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 25th day of June, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9999 Holdings, Inc. and George Koumbis v. Max Heatherington and American Tactical Ammunition, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/9999-holdings-inc-and-george-koumbis-v-max-heather-texapp-2009.