96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5664, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9190 Wayne M. Turner v. United States of America Acting Through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, an Agency of the United States of America

91 F.3d 1274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 1996
Docket95-15420
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 F.3d 1274 (96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5664, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9190 Wayne M. Turner v. United States of America Acting Through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, an Agency of the United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5664, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9190 Wayne M. Turner v. United States of America Acting Through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration, an Agency of the United States of America, 91 F.3d 1274 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

91 F.3d 1274

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5664, 96 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 9190
Wayne M. TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America acting Through the U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE, FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, an
agency of the United States of America,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-15420.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 1996*.
Decided July 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-00744-PMP.

James T. Massey, Sisters, Oregon, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ruth L. Cohen, Assistant United States Attorney, Las Vegas, Nevada, for defendant-appellee.

Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and WINMILL, District Judge.**

Appellant Wayne Turner appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States. Turner brought this action to quiet title to real property located in Nevada and for a judgment declaring that a lien on his property had been extinguished by a previous Settlement Agreement. The district court concluded that the Settlement Agreement related only to certain funds held in escrow and the release of those funds; it did not extinguish the lien arising from Turner's obligation on his loan from the Farmers' Home Administration. For the reasons given in parts I-V of Judge Pro's published Order, 875 F.Supp. 1430 (D.Nev.1995), we affirm summary judgment in favor of the United States.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

The Honorable B. Lynn Winmill, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: Mark J. Escoto
Ninth Circuit, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 F.3d 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/96-cal-daily-op-serv-5664-96-daily-journal-dar-9190-wayne-m-turner-ca9-1996.