9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa
This text of 9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa (9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
9352 CRANESBILL TRUST, No. 78925 Appellant, vs. FORT APACHE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, FILED Res iondent. FEB i 8 2620 BROWN ò FSflEME COt SY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint on statute of limitations grounds. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(3). It is so ORDERED.'
L14:44it) , J. Stiglich Silver
'The order entered January 23, 2020, conditionally imposing sanctions• against attorneys Roger Croteau and Timothy Rhoda, is vacated. Mr. Rhoda's motion for relief from the order is denied as moot. SUPREME COURT or NEVADA
(0) 1947A 01640 jq -01..4sF cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Jay Young, Settlement Judge Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd. Leach Kern Gruchow Anderson Song/Las Vegas Roger P. Croteau Timothy Rhoda Supreme Court Law Librarian Eighth District Court Clerk
&ORME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A AO. 2 41 ,1 ;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/9352-cranesbill-tr-vs-fort-apache-hoa-nev-2020.