9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 2020·No. 78925·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

9352 CRANESBILL TRUST, No. 78925 Appellant,

vs.

FORT APACHE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, FILED Res iondent.

FEB i 8 2620

BROWN

ò FSflEME COt

SY

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint on statute of limitations grounds. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge.

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(3).

It is so ORDERED.'

L14:44it) , J.

Stiglich Silver

'The order entered January 23, 2020, conditionally imposing sanctions• against attorneys Roger Croteau and Timothy Rhoda, is vacated. Mr. Rhoda's motion for relief from the order is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT or NEVADA

(0) 1947A 01640 jq -01..4sF cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Jay Young, Settlement Judge Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd. Leach Kern Gruchow Anderson Song/Las Vegas Roger P. Croteau Timothy Rhoda Supreme Court Law Librarian Eighth District Court Clerk

&ORME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A AO.

2
41

,1 ;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa, (Neb. 2020).

9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa (9352 Cranesbill Tr. Vs. Fort Apache Hoa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.