905 West End Avenue Corp. v. Peers

118 Misc. 754
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion was made for judgment on the pleadings, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice referring to An action to recover a debt or liquidated demand arising, 1. on a contract, express or implied, sealed or not sealed; or 2. on a judgment for a stated sum.” We are of the opinion that the rule is inapplicable to a summary proceeding. Moreover, if considered as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the granting of the motion was unauthorized, because an issue was raised not only by statutory defense but also by the denial of personal demand of the rent by the landlord.

Final order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant, motion to strike out answer denied, with ten dollars costs, and case placed upon the general calendar.

All concur.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

905 West End Avenue Corp. v. Peers, 118 Misc. 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

118 Misc. 754 (905 West End Avenue Corp. v. Peers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hecht v. Maness
23 Misc. 2d 889 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Miressi v. Funicello
277 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Hanover Estates, lnc. v. Finkelstein
194 Misc. 755 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1949)