900 G. C. Affiliates, Inc. v. Myerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

900 G. C. Affiliates, Inc. v. Myerson

42 A.D.2d 554, 346 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4004

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 554 (900 G. C. Affiliates, Inc. v. Myerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

900 G. C. Affiliates, Inc. v. Myerson, 42 A.D.2d 554, 346 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent, dated March 19, 1973, revoking three cabaret -licenses of petitioner at the Concourse Plaza Hotel in the Bronx is unanimously modified, on the law, to annul the revocations except as to “ The Tunnel ” which [555]*555revocation is confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. One license covers the Grand Ballroom and another the main floor Wedgwood and Crystal Rooms, and a third is for a basement cabaret known as “The Tunnel”. The evidence adduced, which, in this article 78 proceeding, satisfies the substantial evidence rule, applies, however, mainly to the revocation which we sustain and has little if any application to the Ballroom and Wedgewood and Crystal Rooms and, therefore, those license revocations are annulled- The denial of an adjournment, under all the circumstances, was not arbitrary or capricious. (Cf. Mints Poultry v. Walkley, 41 A D 2d 865.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent, dated March 19, 1973, revoking three cabaret -licenses of petitioner at the Concourse Plaza Hotel in the Bronx is unanimously modified, on the law, to annul the revocations except as to “ The Tunnel ” which [555]*555revocation is confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. One license covers the Grand Ballroom and another the main floor Wedgwood and Crystal Rooms, and a third is for a basement cabaret known as “The Tunnel”. The evidence adduced, which, in this article 78 proceeding, satisfies the substantial evidence rule, applies, however, mainly to the revocation which we sustain and has little if any application to the Ballroom and Wedgewood and Crystal Rooms and, therefore, those license revocations are annulled- The denial of an adjournment, under all the circumstances, was not arbitrary or capricious. (Cf. Mints Poultry v. Walkley, 41 A D 2d 865.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 554, 346 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/900-g-c-affiliates-inc-v-myerson-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack