893 Bway LLC v. Warman Enterprises

90 A.D.3d 578, 934 N.Y.2d 805

This text of 90 A.D.3d 578 (893 Bway LLC v. Warman Enterprises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
893 Bway LLC v. Warman Enterprises, 90 A.D.3d 578, 934 N.Y.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

In this action arising from a failed contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff purchaser alleges that it was entitled to cancel the contract based on a hazardous condition caused by defendant seller. Plaintiff claims that defendant removed underground oil tanks, after the execution of the contract, in violation of its contractual obligation to maintain the premises “as is” and in “their present condition.” On its motion, defendant submitted a contractor’s report which found evidence of oil contamination and made remediation recommendations. Defendant’s conclusory claim that it corrected the condition at a cost of approximately $5,000 is not supported by documentary evidence, lacks probative value, and is insufficient to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Similarly, plaintiff on the record failed to present a prima facie showing entitling it to summary judgment. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 578, 934 N.Y.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/893-bway-llc-v-warman-enterprises-nyappdiv-2011.