89-52 Rest., Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

47 A.D.2d 671, 364 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated December 11, 1974, canceling petitioner’s liquor license and imposing a $1,000 bond claim, upon findings that petitioner had (1) abetted a violation of section 100 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control [672] Law by one Ben Skelton and (2) purchased alcoholic beverages for resale from a person not duly licensed to sell them for resale, thereby violating subdivision 3-b of section 102 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. Petition granted, on the law, without costs, to the extent that (1) the finding of violation of section 100 is annulled and (2) the penalties are annulled; and the matter is remanded to the State Liquor Authority for the fixation of such penalty as is warranted by the record, not to exceed a short period of suspension; determination otherwise confirmed. The evidence was insufficient to establish that petitioner’s principal knowingly abetted a violation of the licensing provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by Ben Skelton. The penalty was excessive to the extent indicated herein and therefore was an abuse of discretion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Shapiro, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

89-52 Rest., Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 47 A.D.2d 671, 364 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

47 A.D.2d 671 (89-52 Rest., Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CVS Discount Liquor, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
207 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)