873 Third Avenue Corp. v. Kenvic Associates
491 N.E.2d 679, 67 N.Y.2d 767, 500 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17409
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with former Justice Max Bloom, writing for the majority at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 489), that the ground lessee (referred to as lessor in [770] that opinion) did not have an ownership interest in the premises within the meaning of the ordinance.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
873 Third Avenue Corp. v. Kenvic Associates, 491 N.E.2d 679, 67 N.Y.2d 767, 500 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17409 (N.Y. 1986).
491 N.E.2d 679 (873 Third Avenue Corp. v. Kenvic Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hamilton
232 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Sledge
223 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Collins
123 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Mertz
497 N.E.2d 657 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)