Home/New York Court of Appeals/850 CO. v. Schwartz

850 CO. v. Schwartz

206 N.E.2d 361, 15 N.Y.2d 899, 258 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1559
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 1965·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the order of Special Term reinstated. Petitioner, by virtue of having converted and leased 60% of its building as business space, having timely made application for certificates of decontrol, having obtained a certificate of occupancy, and having instituted this proceeding, had a. right “ accruing ” within the meaning of section 93 of the General Construction Law (Cameron v. New York & Mount Vernon Water Co., 133 N. Y. 336, 341).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

850 CO. v. Schwartz, 206 N.E.2d 361, 15 N.Y.2d 899, 258 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1559 (N.Y. 1965).

206 N.E.2d 361 (850 CO. v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cameron v. New York & Mount Vernon Water Co.
31 N.E. 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)