850 CO. v. Schwartz
This text of 206 N.E.2d 361 (850 CO. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the order of Special Term reinstated. Petitioner, by virtue of having converted and leased 60% of its building as business space, having timely made application for certificates of decontrol, having obtained a certificate of occupancy, and having instituted this proceeding, had a. right “ accruing ” within the meaning of section 93 of the General Construction Law (Cameron v. New York & Mount Vernon Water Co., 133 N. Y. 336, 341).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 N.E.2d 361, 15 N.Y.2d 899, 258 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/850-co-v-schwartz-ny-1965.