7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon

193 So. 3d 1087, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9420, 2016 WL 3385079
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 2016·No. No. 5D15-74·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification of Order Granting Attorneys’ Fees. We deny the motion for rehearing, but grant the motion for clarification based on Appellant, 7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC’s, confession of error. Inasmuch as 7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC, is not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees, we clarify that the April 22, 2016 order awarding attorney’s fees shall apply only to Appellant, Andrew La Rosa.

' REHEARING DENIED; CLARIFICATION GRANTED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon, 193 So. 3d 1087, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9420, 2016 WL 3385079 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

193 So. 3d 1087 (7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.