78 South First Street Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Crotty
555 N.E.2d 906, 75 N.Y.2d 982, 556 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1015
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, defendants’ motion to dismiss [985] the complaint granted and certified question answered in the negative for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice E. Leo Milonas at the Appellate Division (150 AD2d 218, 220-222).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
78 South First Street Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Crotty, 555 N.E.2d 906, 75 N.Y.2d 982, 556 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1015 (N.Y. 1990).
555 N.E.2d 906 (78 South First Street Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Crotty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rudin v. Tax Commission of New York (In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co.)
233 B.R. 662 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Kraebel v. New York City Department of Finance
217 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
G.A.D. Holding Co. v. City of New York Department of Finance
192 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Kuhn v. State Dept. of Revenue of State of Colo.
817 P.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)