729 Third Ave Rest. LLC v. DOLP 733 Prop. II LLC

2025 NY Slip Op 32801(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedAugust 13, 2025
DocketIndex No. 156578/2022
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 32801(U) (729 Third Ave Rest. LLC v. DOLP 733 Prop. II LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
729 Third Ave Rest. LLC v. DOLP 733 Prop. II LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 32801(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

729 Third Ave Rest. LLC v DOLP 733 Prop. II LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 32801(U) August 13, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156578/2022 Judge: Leslie A. Stroth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2025 04:40 PM INDEX NO. 156578/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LESLIE A. STROTH PART 12M Justice - ------- - - ----- - - - - - - - - -- - --------------------------- -X INDEX NO. 156578/2022 729 THIRD AVE RESTAURANT LLC, MOTION DATE 10/13/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ ___:0:. . :0. .c.1_ _ - V -

DOLP 733 PROPERTIES II LLC ,ROYAL REAL TY CORP. , JAMES E. FITZGERALD INC ., COASTAL WATERPROOFING LLC,J.T. MAGEN & COMPANY DECISION + ORDER ON INC.,JOHN GALLIN & SON INC .,KING HOIST & CONTRACTING, INC ., S.T. RUD CONSTRUCTION MOTION CORPORATION , XYZ CONCTRACTORS 1-1 0,

Defendant. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X

JAMES E. FITZGERALD INC . Th ird-Party Index No. 595793/2023 Plaintiff,

-against-

KING HOIST & SCAFFOLDING , INC .

Defendant. ------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------- X

COASTAL WATERPROOFING LLC Second Th ird-Party Index No. 595016/2024 Plaintiff,

ALTAMI NA CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X

The follow ing e-filed documents , listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 68, 69, 70, 71 , 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 were read on this motion to/for DISMISSAL

156578/2022 729 THIRD AVE RESTAURANT LLC vs. DOLP 733 PROPERTIES II LLC ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 001

[* 1] 1 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2025 04:40 PM INDEX NO. 156578/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2025

Plaintiff, Rosie Dunn's, has possessed the premises located at 729 Third Avenue, New

York, New York, since October 1, 2018, where it operates a restaurant in a two-story building

with a basement. The adjacent property at 733 Third A venue contains a 23-story mixed-use

building. At all relevant times, defendant Durst owned 733 Third A venue, and defendant Royal

served as its managing agent and property manager.

The complaint alleges that DOLP 733 Properties, Royal Realty Corp., S.T. Rud

Construction Corporation, Fitzgerald, Coastal Waterproofing, J.T. Magen & Company, John

Gallin & Son ("Gallin"), and King Hoist & Contracting (collectively, "Construction

Defendants") entered into contracts to perform construction work and services at 733 Third

A venue, including by hiring subcontractors and directing and controlling the work. Plaintiff

alleges that, in connection with that work, agents, servants, and employees of the defendants

entered the restaurant premises, erected scaffolding and sidewalk bridges on top of the restaurant

and performed construction activities on its roof.

Plaintiff claims that the work was negligently performed, including by covering roof

drain systems, improperly flashing waterproofing, and placing pipe scaffolding without proper

roof protection. Plaintiff further alleges that the construction caused water damage, ceiling

collapses, broken window and door frames, and other property damage, and that defendants

unreasonably delayed completion of their work, interfering with plaintiff's use and enjoyment of

the premises.

Plaintiff asserts causes of action for negligence, trespass, and nuisance against all

defendants, including Gallin, and seeks compensatory damages for property damage and loss of

business use.

156578/2022 729 THIRD AVE RESTAURANT LLC vs. DOLP 733 PROPERTIES II LLC ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001

[* 2] 2 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2025 04:40 PM INDEX NO. 156578/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2025

Gall in moves in Motion Sequence 001 to dismiss the Complaint against it pursuant to

CPLR 321 l(a)(l) and (a)(7).

Pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)(l) "dismissal is warranted only if the documentary evidence

submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law." (Leon v

Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994])

However, the Work Order submitted by Defendant Gallin includes line items for

Sidewalk Protection/Scaffolding. Moreover, the submitted evidence does not definitively show

that Defendant Gallin had no part in the exterior work at 733 3rd Avenue. Accordingly, the

documentary evidence does not conclusively establish a defense to the asserted claims, as Gallin

has not met their prima facie burden based on the documentary evidence provided.

Pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), a party may move to dismiss a claim on the ground that

the pleading fails to state a cause of action. Upon such a motion, the Court must accept the facts

alleged as true and determine simply whether plaintiffs facts fit within any cognizable legal

theory. See CPLR 3026; Marone v Marone, 50 NY2d 481 (1980). The complaint shall be

liberally construed, and the allegations are given the benefit of every possible favorable

inference. (See Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 ( 1994)).

Defendant Gallin's motion is based on the premise that it conclusively had no part in the

exterior work at 733 3 rd Avenue. As discussed infra, Gatlin has failed to make such a showing,

and as such the court finds that dismissal at this early stage of the litigation is premature. As

such, Gallin's motion to dismiss is denied in its entirety.

The court has considered the remaining arguments and finds such unavailing.

Accordingly; it is hereby

156578/2022 729 THIRD AVE RESTAURANT LLC vs. DOLP 733 PROPERTIES II LLC ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001 ·

[* 3] 3 of 4 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2025 04:40 PM INDEX NO. 156578/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2025

ORDERED that Motion 001 by Gallin to dismiss the complaint is denied in its entirety.

The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of the court.

8/13/2025 DATE HON~[ft!RPl.HS-1-ROTH

~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION J.S.C. GRANTED 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION : SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE : INC LU DES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

156578/2022 729 THIRD AVE RESTAURANT LLC vs. DOLP 733 PROPERTIES II LLC ET AL Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 001

[* 4] 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leon v. Martinez
638 N.E.2d 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Morone v. Morone
413 N.E.2d 1154 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 32801(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/729-third-ave-rest-llc-v-dolp-733-prop-ii-llc-nysupctnewyork-2025.