721 East 6th Street HDFC v. Ostrega

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

721 East 6th Street HDFC v. Ostrega

249 A.D.2d 550, 671 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4556

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 550 (721 East 6th Street HDFC v. Ostrega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

721 East 6th Street HDFC v. Ostrega, 249 A.D.2d 550, 671 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 21, 1994, which denied [551]*551the petitioners’ application for an exemption from water and sewer charges, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated April 27, 1995, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection to deny the petitioners’ application for an exemption from water and sewer charges was not arbitrary or capricious.

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 21, 1994, which denied [551]*551the petitioners’ application for an exemption from water and sewer charges, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated April 27, 1995, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection to deny the petitioners’ application for an exemption from water and sewer charges was not arbitrary or capricious.

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 550, 671 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/721-east-6th-street-hdfc-v-ostrega-nyappdiv-1998.