71 Clinton Street Apartments LLC v. Ilana Industrial LLC

126 A.D.3d 451, 2 N.Y.S.3d 355
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 2015·No. 382040/110 ---14441 14440 14439 14438 14437·Published

Opinion

Amended judgment of foreclosure, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered July 15, 2013, in favor of plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the prior judgment of foreclosure, entered March 1, 2013, and from orders, entered on or about January 19, 2012, July 13, 2012, September 20, 2012, and July 15, 2013, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the amended judgment.

Plaintiff presented a prima facie right to foreclosure by producing the mortgage documents and undisputed evidence of defendant’s nonpayment, and, in opposition, defendants failed to establish the existence of a triable issue regarding their affirmative defenses (see e.g. Red Tulip, LLC v Neiva, 44 AD3d 204, 209 [1st Dept 2007], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 741 [2008]). Nothing in the record casts doubt on whether the note and mortgage were validly assigned to plaintiff (see 71 Clinton St. Apts. LLC v 71 Clinton Inc., 114 AD3d 583 [1st Dept 2014]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

71 Clinton Street Apartments LLC v. Ilana Industrial LLC, 126 A.D.3d 451, 2 N.Y.S.3d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

126 A.D.3d 451 (71 Clinton Street Apartments LLC v. Ilana Industrial LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Red Tulip, LLC v. Neiva
44 A.D.3d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
71 Clinton St. Apts. LLC v. 71 Clinton Inc.
114 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)