Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford Associates

669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford Associates

686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 949, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 500
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 4, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 686 A.2d 126 (669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford Associates, 686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 949, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 500 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 113 (AC 14928), is denied.

[950]*950Decided December 4, 1996 James R. Fogarty and Stephanie Budlong Paul, in support of the petition. Katherine C. Callahan, Kevin N. Reynolds and Robert R. Simpson, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford Associates
682 A.2d 572 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 949, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/669-atlantic-street-associates-v-atlantic-rockland-stamford-associates-conn-1996.